Currently browsing tag

Low-Tech Options

Article: Mayer et al. (2009)

Reference: Mayer, R. E., Stull, A., DeLeeuw, K., Almeroth, K., Bimber, B., Chun, D., Bulger, M., Campbell, J., Knight, A., & Zhang, …

Article: Lasry (2008)

Reference: Lasry, N. (2008). Clickers or flashcards: Is there really a difference? The Physics Teacher 46(4), 242-244. Summary: Lasry reports the results …

The Costs (and Benefits) of Clickers

This week’s Chronicle of Higher Education includes an essay by Michael Bugeja, director of the Greenlee School of Journalism and Communication at …

More on Presidential Debates

In my last post, I noted that students at Washburn University in Topeka, Kansas, used clickers to answer polling questions before and …

Article: Jenkins (2007)

Reference: Jenkins, A. (2007). Technique and technology: Electronic voting systems in an English literature lecture. Pedagogy, 7(3), 526-533. Summary: In this article, …

Low-Tech Alternatives to Clickers

A couple of weeks ago, Inside Higher Ed posted an article titled “Keeping Clickers in the Classroom” based on a presentation made …

Article: Stowell & Nelson (2007)

Reference: Stowell, J. R., & Nelson, J. M. (2007). Benefits of electronic audience response systems on student participation, learning, and emotion. Teaching …