We ran out of time at the end of class today to wrap up our discussion of the ethics of military cryptography. Sorry about that! I think our in-class activity worked well, but it needed a bit of discussion at the end. In lieu of that discussion, I'll share a few more perspectives on the Zimmerman telegram debate here on the blog.
Claim: Admiral Hall's decision to withhold information from the Americans about the Zimmerman telegram was ethical.
- In the short run, telling the Americans would have saved lives, but maintaining the ability to decipher German messages would save more lives in the long run.
- Hall's first responsibility was to his own country, and that country--and its whole way of life--was at risk from German invasion. That was a bigger risk than the Americans faced, and a more immediate risk.
- Who were the real bad guys here? It was the Germans who were attacking ships. It was the Germans who were lying to the Americans.
- The Americans, as it turned out, were going to drag their feet anyway. Telling them wouldn't have brought them into the war any earlier, and it might have compromised British cryptography efforts.
Claim: Admiral Hall's decision to withhold information from the Americans about the Zimmerman telegram was NOT ethical.
- By not telling the Americans, people definitely died. Had the British told the Americans and the Germans realized their codes were broken, more lives might have been lost in the long run—but, in the short run, people definitely died.
- What England did was as unethical as what Germany did—manipulating the Americans for their own ends.
- Britain wanted America as an ally, which is a trust-based relationship. Hall was keeping secrets from the American government and undermining the trust between the nations.
- Hall could have justified his decision by saying that he was doing what was, in his mind, best for America. However, that wasn't his place--it was the responsibility of the American government to make such decisions.
- Didn’t Hall plan to let the submarine warfare happen so that America would be prompted into war? Dragging more people into a conflict is only going to result in more deaths.
Keep in mind that, in an effort to tell engaging and accessible stories, the author sometimes omits some of the complexities of the issues he discusses. As you read, consider ways that you can approach these issues from multiple perspectives.