Here's the info on your final paper assignment.
Category: Course Info (Page 1 of 5)
Update 11/9/17: Here's your review guide for the math exam on Friday, November 10, 2017.
I'll have a review guide for your math exam available at some point. In the meantime, please mark your calendars with these review sessions:
- Monday, November 6th, 11am to 12pm
- Monday, November 6th, 4pm to 5pm
They're optional, and you don't need to go to both, although you're welcome to do so. Both will be in our regular classroom at the Center for Teaching.
See below for your podcast assignment. Outlines are due Wednesday, October 25th, and episodes (including show notes and a producer's statement) are due Wednesday, November 1st.
Rhett McDaniel, educational technologist at the Center for Teaching, will join us this Friday, October 20th, to show how to use Audacity to edit audio and to walk us through some of the podcasting resources he has collected.
I haven't set up the Souncloud site for our podcast, but it will eventually look something like the Health Policy Radio podcast that Professor Gilbert Gonzales produced with his class last fall.
Finally, for those interested in more robust training, the Vanderbilt Institute for Digital Learning (VIDL) is offering a series of workshops on audio production starting this Friday.
A few of you have asked how the online participation portion of your grade will be computed. I address this briefly in class, but I thought I would go ahead and put it in writing here on the blog.
Your online participation in this course contributes 10% of your final course grade. At the end of the semester, I'll ask you to review your online participation in this course, compare your participation to that of your peers, and assess your contributions to the learning community. I'll ask you to give yourself an online participation score between 0 and 10 points, and email it to me with a justification (not more than a paragraph). If I think your score is reasonable, given your justification, I'll use that as your online participation grade.
To assess your online participation, focus on blog posts and bookmarks on Diigo, as well as other forms of online participation to come. In each of these areas, I usually ask you for specific contributions -- posts that responded to particular questions, or bookmarks about specific topics, or tags and comments that fit certain parameters. As you look over your contributions to the course, keep these requests in mind. Also consider how your online participation contributed to the learning of your peers in the course.
See below for your first paper assignment, along with the provision rubric I'll use to evaluate your papers. Please note the various deadlines listed in the assignment. We'll talk about the assignment in class, but feel free to reach out to me if you have questions about it.
Here's my August office hour schedule:
- Thursday, August 24, 1-2pm
- Monday, August 28, 1:30-2:30pm
- Tuesday, August 29, 3-4pm
- Thursday, August 31, 1:30-2:30pm
Regular office hours (Mondays 2-3, Tuesdays 3-4, Thursdays 11-12) will start in September, once the start-of-semester business is over.
I'm excited to teach "Cryptography: The History and Mathematics of Codes and Ciphers" again this fall. It's my favorite course to teach, and I hope you find it interesting, too.
Here's a copy of the Fall 2017 syllabus. Please read this before class on Friday, when we'll talk about various aspects of the course and I'll take your questions on the syllabus.
On the Contact page, you'll find directions to my office, which you'll need for the "get to know you meetings" you signed up for over the next week. Be sure to give yourself a few extra minutes to find my office the first time, and feel free to call the Center for Teaching (where I work) if you get lost: 615-322-7290.
I thought I would share a couple of links related to Edward Snowden and the NSA. During class, I shared this graphic from ProPublica summarizing the various NSA programs that we've learned about from Snowden's leak. I also recommend listening to this interview with one of the reporters who put together the chart, which aired on ProPublica's podcast.
I'll also remind you that you should read the first chapter in our textbook, The Code Book by Simon Singh, before class on Monday. We'll talk about other upcoming assignments during class on Friday.
Near the end of the fall 2015 semester, I asked students in this course to provide some feedback on the course through an anonymous online survey. I thought I would share a few highlights from that survey here on the blog for past and future students.
Course Activities. On the survey, I asked students to rate various course activities as useful (or not) to their learning. The activities rated most useful to student learning were:
- reading the textbook (The Code Book by Simon Singh),
- blogging about the readings prior to class,
- reading peers' blog posts,
- discussing the readings during class,
- working through the problem sets,
- studying for the math exam, and
- writing papers.
Activities that were rated less useful included reading Little Brother by Cory Doctorow, exploring peer contributions to the class bookmark group on Diigo, and making use of the class timeline on the history of cryptography. Each of these activities were seen as useful by some students, but were not rated as universally useful as the activities listed above.
My takeaway? See if I can integrate the bookmarking and timeline activities more into major course assignments, so that those elements of the course are more useful to future students.
Classroom Activities. I also asked student to rate the usefulness of select in-class activities to their learning. Top of this list were:
- working through math and crypto problems during class,
- spending class time workshopping paper drafts,
- analyzing papers written by students during previous offerings of the course,
- discussing a single student's draft paper using clickers and a rubric,
- hearing from guest speaker and cryptographer Elonka Dunin,
- building a "security vs. privacy" debate map collaboratively using Post-it notes, and
- learning how to send encrypted emails.
Less useful activities (again, useful to some, but not useful across the board) included using clicker questions to explore academic integrity issues, reading and commenting on peers' blog posts during class, and debating "security vs. privacy" by role-playing various expert perspectives.
My takeaways? Since most of the "most useful" activities are ones I've used multiple times, continue to refine my lesson plans each time I teach the course to improve individual activities. And continue to approach my lesson plans with as much creativity as I can muster!
Advice to Future Students. What advice would my fall 2015 students offer to a student who plans to enroll in and hopes to do well in this course? Here's a selection:
- "Do ALL of the reading, and PARTICIPATE. This class is amazing, informative, and very interesting, but only if you actually take part."
- "I would advise them to put in the effort necessary to do well in the course. It is a very rewarding course, but it does require a lot of work."
- "Keep on top of the math, and even when working through problem sets with friends, make sure you can do it on your own. Always, always ask questions."
- "I would advise the student to keep an open mind when approaching the security vs. privacy issue, as their mind may change throughout the course as they continue to learn more about cryptography."
- "I would tell the student to keep up on the Singh reading, and give themselves enough time not only to read what is written but also to go over it a few times to understand the math behind it."
- "I would tell them to work the problem sets both by themselves and with a group as both are helpful in different ways."
- "Make sure to read the required readings, and don't procrastinate on the papers."
- "I would tell them to continuously watch for cryptography examples both in the news and in their everyday lives, as it plays a much bigger role than I could have ever imagined before taking the course."
My takeaway? I'll definitely share this advice with my next group of students!
Suggestions. Students provided a number of suggestions for future offerings of the course. Below are a few of them, with my thoughts in parentheses.
- "I think that it's important to spend a little more time on Little Brother. It seemed less like a part of the course and more like a short break from the course." (This comment came up more than once in the feedback. I'll see what I can do next time to integrate the novel more in the course.)
- "Because our question of security vs. privacy was evident throughout the semester, I think a debate would be an effective addition to the course." (We had a very fun "security vs. privacy" debate in the 2014 offering of the course. I'll probably bring that back in future offerings.)
- "Using different forms of media to express our own views was helpful, but maybe looking more into the opinions of others in the field on social media would be just as helpful." (Since this course is a first-year writing seminar, I'm required to ask students to write a lot. That's not to say, however, that I couldn't work maybe one multimedia assignment into the syllabus! And it's been a goal for a few years now to build in a few Twitter assignments to the course. Next time!)
- "Our class very early on began collaborating naturally, but I would suggest in the coming years to recommend this to your students as I personally found it very helpful ." (I was frankly amazed at how naturally the fall 2015 students started working together outside of class on problem sets. I think a few of them probably should have also visited my office hours from time time, but, in general, the out-of-class collaboration was a success. I'll continue to encourage this in the future, perhaps even suggesting GroupMe as a way to get organized.)
- "More blogs but with less emphasis on each one (e.g. not having other students critique them) so students can feel more comfortable/less pressure writing them." (I saw the blog assignments as fairly low-stakes, informal writing, but it would seem that this student, at least, felt differently. I might try to handle the peer review piece of the class differently in the future, emphasizing its role in preparing students for later, higher-stakes writing assignments. Or bring in Twitter for shorter, more frequently, very informal writing assignments.)
- "Perhaps you could give an assignment where each student chooses a cipher that hasn't been discussed yet and writes about it in detail." (This was a paper assignment in each of the previous iterations of the course! It's a great assignment, but I felt that it needed a break, mainly because many of the good cipher choices have been covered by students in their Wonders & Marvels essays.)
- "I think there could be a harder push towards writing on very unique subjects; this way we can explore what might be very interesting to us individually." (Good point. Without the paper assignment described above, the course had a little less freedom for students to explore topics of personal interest. I'll see if I can rebalance this aspect of paper assignments next time.)
- "I personally wasn't a fan of the first paper... not sure why but I think it was kind of hard to be confined to the opinions of the 3 articles we had to choose from." (Another vote for a little more freedom to explore topics! I'll definitely build in more of this next time.)
Thanks to my students for providing such useful feedback. I'll be sure to review all the feedback when I return to this course in the future.
For your final paper, you’ll tackle the cryptography question of our time: security vs. privacy. Should our government be given wide latitude to use electronic surveillance in the interests of national security, even if that means citizens’ privacy is not always respected? This is a question we’ve explored in every offering of this course. Thanks to Edward Snowden’s 2013 revelations about the National Security Agency, it’s now part of our national dialogue. We have explored this question from many angles this semester. This paper is your opportunity to spend time thinking critically about the question and crafting a well-supported answer.
Actually, the question above is just one way to frame the topic. You’re welcome to respond to that very question, but you’re also welcome to go in some other direction. You might propose something very concrete, perhaps a response to the recent Paris attacks, or you could take a more abstract approach and analyze the rhetoric used in this debate (“security”? “versus”?). You could look broadly at securing the US from terror attacks, or you could shift the focus to a different context—say, surveillance in schools. Your task is to come up with an interesting thesis that addresses some aspect of the security, privacy, and surveillance discussion, then defend your thesis with arguments and evidence.
You’re welcome to use our Diigo group as a source of ideas, examples, and evidence. You’re also welcome to bookmark new sources to the group as you work on your paper. Although you’re not allowed to collaborate on writing your papers, sharing sources via Diigo is approved and encouraged.
Your paper will be graded on the strength and clarity of your arguments, as well as the quality of your sources. See the rubric for details.
LENGTH AND FORMATTING
Your paper should be between 1,500 and 2,000 words in length, and it should use American Psychological Association (APA) formatting for citations and references. Citations appear within the text of your paper, references at the end. Both should be properly formatted. See Purdue University’s Online Writing Lab, https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/560/02/, for a useful guide to APA formatting.
DRAFTS AND REVISIONS
You aren’t required to turn in an outline or rough draft of your paper, although if you send me an outline or draft by Monday, December 14th, I’ll give you a little feedback.
Your final paper is due via Blackboard by 11:59 p.m. on Wednesday, December 16th.
Please familiarize yourself with Vanderbilt’s Honor System. I’m encouraging a lot of sharing and collaboration in this course, but your work on your paper assignments should be your own. Please be careful not to plagiarize. The Writing Studio has a great set of resources on working with sources in academic writing (http://vanderbilt.edu/writing/resources/handouts/). We’ll spend some class time exploring plagiarism and academic integrity more generally.
If your life is falling apart and you are tempted to plagiarize to save time or get a good grade, please see me instead. I would rather grant you an extension than send you before the Honor Council.